Tuhan Manusia: A Review
In reading Faisal Tehrani's new novel 'Tuhan Manusia', I am struck by a few things. Mainly how unlike a novel it is. Take away the 'only just' plot, add a few footnotes and a bibliography, and you would've a formidable collection of essays, each demanding the reader digest it separately. Not that it's something that's easily read in one sitting, 'A Thousand Splendid Suns' this is not. In this book, Mr Tehrani ambitiously tackles the topic of apostasy head on. A politically charged issue in muslim communities worldwide, but especially so in Malaysia, 'Tuhan Manusia' is unapologetic in its staunchly orthodox opposition against it, as well as against movements that call for 'radically liberal' (for lack of a clearer term) reinterpretations of Islam, which the novel considers the poisoned apple that tricks its victims into the ultimate sin of shirk. The plot revolves around the life of Ali Taqi, a student, as he explores the realms of liberalism and pluralism. This is no hollow academic exercise for him. Rather, it is motivated by his hatred and disgust towards them following his brother's apostasy. Guided by his teachers and mentors, long (and not particularly novel-like) discussions ensue. Antagonistic characters exist in the form of Zehra, a schoolmate (and requisite love interest), and her father, Aris, a public figure associated with a liberal organisation, and they represent the opposite viewpoints in the story. The plot progresses as Ali grows more fervent in his opposition and activism, culminating in a public exchange between him and Aris, whom he holds responsible for his brother's actions. As a novel, 'Tuhan Manusia' is well-written in an eloquent and excellent Bahasa Melayu, but that is to be expected from Faisal Tehrani, whose works are popular with both critics and readers. And as what I suppose is a mark of a skilled writer, for such a topic laden with emotions, Faisal has avoided smothering the reader with sentiments. And despite this being a book where apostasy is central, fire and brimstone rarely surface. When it is dished out, it is classy and measured. Instead, the book aims squarely at the reader's intellect, thoroughly researched and replete with reference numbers and quotations, saving us the grief of public executions and 'de-flowerings'. And thankfully, 'Tuhan Manusia' is a free of kissing eyes and stolen glances. What is it with Muslim authors and repressed sexuality anyway? Unfortunately, this is where the accolades end. If traditional figures of authority and symbols are frequently painted as one-sided sneering characters in best-selling novels about Islam, here the opposite is true. Those in the 'liberal' camp are portrayed as ignorant, wayward and anarchistic personalities who spout pluralistic dictums without fully understanding what they mean, nor aware that they are mere pawns in a global conspiracy against Islam. And strangely, traditional figures are still not sneer-free. Conspiracy theories notwithstanding, one cannot help but feel that the same kind of treatment towards orthodoxy is not mirrored towards opinions from the other camp. Readers are made to feel that the ideas espoused by the novel's liberals are not only destructive, but essentially worthless as well. IMHO, this detracts from the novel's potential. If the author intended to bring some quality preaching (and we all know how plentiful those are) to the choir, he has succeeded. This book is no kuliah maghrib, with cheap laughs and double-entendres. A person with only wisps of distrust towards Liberal Islam prior to reading 'Tuhan Manusia', will certainly find himself well-armed and psyched for battle with those wayward liberals soon after. The number of Quranic verses among the text alone would dazzle some people, but it is highly improbable that the more rationally inclined would even care. It is difficult to think of this book as any more than a reminder, almost like a novelised version of the anti-apostasy roadshows. The book does not traverse the distance between being purely demagogic to becoming the book that fundamentally changes the direction of the debate. If anything, hard-core supporters from both sides who read the book are probably only going to dig their heels in deeper, one side energised by the powerful arguments and proofs from Islamic texts, gaining some meaning for their oft-repeated slogans; while the other more convinced of the former's inability to think beyond them, thus strengthening the idea of sarong-clad kampung simpletons, clearly of an inferior intellectual plane. So would I recommend it? Certainly. If there's only one BM book you're going to read this year, this is it. Whatever disagreements the reader has with the author, there's no denying that this book makes an excellent read. This book is Faisal Tehrani's salvo in the apostasy debate. It may not solve the problem, but 'Tuhan Manusia' does provide valuable insights into orthodox islam's views towards the burning issues of apostasy, pluralism, liberalism and fundamentalism, which are invaluable to anyone who wishes to understand the hatred and vitriol that abound. 'Tuhan Manusia' by Faisal Tehrani
is available at all good bookstores and online, at ujanailmu.com.my.
9 comments:
Ermm... this book gonna make my brain thinking real hard... hhaha !!... kena bace ni baru bleh bg comment selanjutnye...
Ps: after exam pinjam tau?.. haha !!
Dear guests,
Please refrain from personal attacks and rumour-mongering when commenting.
Remember, 'what's wrong in ink, should not be linked'!
Salam,
Dear mlh,
I really love this intelligent, well-thought-out review except for a few points. The one I have the most concern with is the following point - if you could help to clarify please:
How can the measured, rational arguments against pluralism in Tuhan Manusia, be perceived as "ideas of sarong-clad kampung simpletons, clearly of an inferior intellectual plane"?
To me, what this line insinuates is that just because those rational, intellectual arguments are also strengthened and backed by Qur'anic verses, therefore, they may be perceived as ideas from "sarong-clad simpletons with inferior intellectuality".
Is that what you meant?
When we get into an intellectual debate, we have to look at the mindset and the intellectual framework of our opponent.
"Bi-uqulihim" i.e: "with the level of their understanding" is an approach that Muslims can adopt in an intellectual argument. This approach allows us to use the right framework for different kinds of individuals with different background - something along the line of us fitting in the right piece of a puzzle in the right slot to get the right picture. We, therefore, would argue according to the level of intellectuality of our sparring partner/s. The Qur'anic verses/proofs are definitely not for the benefit of those who cannot appreciate them.
I love this review, please don't get me wrong (totally love the line about the repressed sexuality of Muslim authors, coz, I have been wondering about the same thing, lol). If you could be so kind to clarify what you mean with regard to the insinuated lines? My apologies if my interpretation of what you wrote is waaay off course. It would really help critical readers like me if you could be more careful with what you write in the future :)
All in all, thank you for the excellent review of a most excellent book and thank you, in advance, for your response and kind consideration :)
Wassalam.
an appreciative blogreader :)
waalaikum salaaam
"If anything, hard-core supporters from both sides who read the book are probably only going to dig their heels in deeper , one side energised by the powerful arguments and proofs from Islamic texts, gaining some meaning for their oft-repeated slogans; while the other more convinced of the former's inability to think beyond them , thus strengthening the idea of sarong-clad kampung simpletons, clearly of an inferior intellectual plane."
I've reproduced the entire sentence here and added some emphasis which i feel would be helpful in clarifying its meaning.
I am not suggesting that rational arguments strengthened by, or even arguments drawn from Islamic scriptures (and texts) are unsophisticated or intellectually inferior.
I have no doubts that sincere individuals seeking resolution (and not domination over the other) will, at the very least, appreciate the understanding it affords.
However,I do question the need to be dismissive of opposite viewpoints.
As I've stated earlier in the review, "Readers are made to feel that the ideas espoused by the novel's liberals are not only destructive, but essentially worthless as well."
Call me a softie, but I believe in respecting another's opinion however much I disagree with it.
Should another writer produce another book which ridicules and degrade my closely held beliefs instead, I don't think I would be very interested in what the author has to say even if the book contains the best ideas ever.
As the formula goes, "my opinion may be correct, but there may be some wrong in it; and your opinion may be false, but there could be some right in it".
All I'm saying is that the hotheads (which exist on both sides of the fence, i might add) would only grow hotter, unless someone throws water at them.
I hope that makes it clearer. I'm not that good a writer you know.
Salam,
"I'm not that good a writer you know."
You are articulate and has the ability to express yourself well.
It shows in your writing :)
We face the risk of misinterpretation when we write publicly, that's all. And then, the onus is on us to correct misperceptions in whatever way we can, within our capacity, and let others digest our response within their capacity of understanding. Clarifying helps others to understand the angling of our discussion.
You write very well, nothing to worry there! ;)
Thanks, once again, for making the effort to clarify :)
I can clearly see where you are coming from, alhamdulillah :)
Wassalam.
lol(*^^*)! Timakasey timakaseyh...
Cubalah kaitkan link ni dengan kaitan yang berkenaan dengan post ini :
Salam,
You are welcome :)
Mlh, with all sincerity, I kinda pursued the issue a bit at FT's blog coz another blogger wrote something along the same lines as you did, although he gave another point of view.
I can't seem to find your email address to explain that reply of mine personally to you.
In any case, it was just to elaborate on what I mean about "bi-uqulihim" through exact examples from the novel, using the labels that you gave in your review as points of reference (which could easily be misconstrued as points of attack, which, honestly, isn't what I was trying to do).
I was hoping for those who read TM to have another angle from which to understand the arguments within the novel, especially with regard to the Qur'anic verses/proofs.
I hope you look at it as such and not take heart :) Such exchanges will only help enrich our understanding in all ways, insyaAllah :)
Thanks for the link, will have a look at it :)
Wassalam.
Kak Sofwah :)
(who obviously loves this novel ;D)
Salaam,
Seeing as how this post has become a bit of a hotspot (kudos to you, Tuan Blog), I felt compelled to randomly comment about the post (not the book - have not had the chance to read it):
You, Lutfi, a softie? Only to cats, maybe. I've had enough arguments with you to know that.
Having read Faisal Tehrani's works before (Advencer Si Peniup Ney, which was a brilliant satire, and another novel which name does not quite click right now), I can understand your view and Kak Sofwah's.
On one hand, Faisal does write in a lyrical and rational narrative, infused with Qur'anic verses and accompanied by the appropriate tafseer and rational arguments supporting the verses. I've found Faisal to also be a rather spiritual person, as evident in the sufi influences of his previous novels. He is, no doubt, an excellent author (who else can win consecutive prizes in a single year within the same category, anonymously?), and is one of the more prominent writers in Malaysia who writes stories with obvious Islamic tones. Not to mention, one of the few who dare even tiptoe around current issues and even - gasp! - politics.
However, he also has an obstinate style of writing. Could be due to self-confidence, and that has to be admired. His manner of writing indicates the certainty of his arguments - that they are absolute and ultimately futile to refute. And while this is applicable in terms of matters of Islamic jurisprudence, I find that it is not as feasible a manner when dealing with human behaviour, which is, inevitably, the crux of the novel's plot. And even the author's own blog indicates his strong character. A
nd with this, I can understand Lutfi's wariness of Faisal's slightly biased interpretation of events - where a novel, and especially one dealing with such a contentious current issue, can be used as a means of breaking barriers and bridging differences, it is sad to see it become yet another voice in the long argument.
(You, Lutfi, should check out Waleed Aly's People Like Us. He sounds more like your kinda guy.)
And on the topic of repressed sexuality -- not you too, Lutfi! I've read enough of VS Naipaul's biased, heavy-handed, colonialist interpretation of Islamic lifestyles without having YOU insinuate it as well. I personally chalk it up to the motto that 'sex sells' (however unfortunate it may be, it is the truth as we were brought up to subscribe to), and a novel without a love interest had better deal with a good murder, if it wants to leave the shelves at all. As a wannabe-writer, I understand the pressures of a plot. And nothing is as predictable, manageable and also attractive as a good old love story, smack in the middle of all the serious business. Just as the Man Booker Prize winners.
All that said (phew! Sorry, Lutfi), I am now scared to read Tuhan Manusia. I have yet to learn to be an impartial critic, and Faisal Tehrani as a blogger has gotten on my nerves this past year.
Salam,
I am sooo sooo happy to have come across this blog where discussions about TM can take place rationally and objectively.
So, MLH's not a softie, huh? lol... I never for once thought that he is ;)
MLH, with regard to the link that you shared with us, honestly, you, me, and FT (whether he'll admit or not) are on the same page. Try reading his horribly naughty short story in his early naughty writing days called, “Diskusi: Bianglala Reykjavik” to see what I mean ;) The cerpen is in his compilation of short story under "Perempuan Anggerik".
Syazwina, if you’re up to it, you may want to try reading TM from the standpoint of listening to an ustaz expounding his perspectives about apostasy. It’s just a perspective. I never took FT’s views in TM (or any other novel) as final and complete. Those are his views and I have my personal views. His views may enrich mine – either by adding to my understanding or causing me to counter-react, thus, again, adding to my understanding of my own views and his. And then, well, if the combination of our views can contribute to some kind of understanding about the problem at hand - in this case, apostasy - that policy-makers someday can consider to come up with the best solutions, that would be a win-win situation for the society indeed! ;)
I find it funny when readers get angry at the book, saying that it’s FT’s perspectives alone. Well, it’s his novel. Of course, it’s gonna contain his perspective on issues, based on his extensive research (they are not just theories that appear out of nowhere…). There’s really no need to get offended. Lol. Either you agree or you disagree - let’s just look at the concerns objectively, just like what MLH did superbly :)
One last thing: What I concluded from our discussions is that there seems to be one way of da'wah... MLH, thanks to you and JR from jiwarasa.blogspot.com, I'm embarking on a mini-research on this :)
And once I have a framework (which would be based on the Qur'an and the sunnah, of course), I am hoping that the community will view da'wah with Qur'anic verses in a totally new way :) Coz, once you can look beyond the injunctions, TM actually contains da’wah strategies to the masses in an intelligent manner, backed by the wisdom of the Qur'an. It's not advocating fighting fire with fire - even if it looks like it on the surface of the text :)
Not sure how long I'll take to complete at least some kind of da'wah framework, but, MLH, I will have to thank you and JR for sparking the idea ;D Jazakumullah, alhamdulillah… and who knows, I can build a thesis to be submitted for the idea… That would be too kool for someone in my field ;)
Wallahu'alam.
Wassalam.
KakSofwah :)
Post a Comment